SketchImage → Imageacademic

DART and DRIFT Diffusion Priors for MRI and 4D-STEM

Figure 1: Data acquisition of a brain in MRI (k-space) and 4D-STEM (diffraction patterns) of crystalline materials, as well as proposed methods: DART (alternating update between trained diffusion prior and physics constraints) and DRIFT (diffusion priors as initialization before applying physical constraints). Physical constraints 𝒢 ​ ( X ) \mathcal{G}(\emph{X}) are adapted depending on the modality (MRI or 4D-STEM).

Input image
Generated result

Paper context

Paper title: Physics-Guided Diffusion Priors for Multi-Slice Reconstruction in Scientific Imaging Abstract: Accurate multi-slice reconstruction from limited measurement data is crucial to speed up the acquisition process in medical and scientific imaging. However, it remains challenging due to the ill-posed nature of the problem and the high computational and memory demands. We propose a framework that addresses these challenges by integrating partitioned diffusion priors with physics-based constraints. By doing so, we substantially reduce memory usage per GPU while preserving high reconstruction quality, outperforming both physics-only and full multi-slice reconstruction baselines for different modalities, namely Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and four-dimensional Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy (4D-STEM). Additionally, we show that the proposed method improves in-distribution accuracy as well as strong generalization to out-of-distribution datasets. Passages referencing this figure: de/ias-8/Distributed˙3DDM Background Figure 1: Data acquisition of a brain in MRI (k-space) and 4D-STEM (diffraction patterns) of crystalline materials, as well as proposed methods: DART (alternating update between trained diffusion prior and physics constraints) and DRIFT (diffusion priors as initialization before applying physical constraints). The acquisition process for both undersampled MRI and 4D-STEM are shown in Figure 1 . The inference procedure is summarized in Algorithm 1 , as well as in Figure 1 where the main difference between DART and DRIFT is visualized. To guarantee the reconstruction of each measurement data for MRI (k-space) and 4D-STEM (diffraction patterns), it should be incorporated in the inference process, as presented in Figure 1 .

The prompt

A reference image is attached above. It is my rough sketch of what I
want my final figure to look like — sometimes hand-drawn, sometimes
an AI quick-draft. The quality is rough; details may be wrong; some
elements may be missing — but it shows the STRUCTURE / SPATIAL LAYOUT
I'm going for.

I've also shared the paper title + abstract + method section + figure
caption + paragraphs that reference this figure.

TASK: Refine my rough sketch into a polished publication-quality figure.

  - Preserve the SPATIAL STRUCTURE of the sketch: where the boxes are,
    how they connect, the overall reading order, the rough proportions.
  - You may correct details: better text labels (use the paper context
    to get the right component names), cleaner shapes, real icons
    instead of stick-figure placeholders.
  - Do NOT regenerate from scratch with a different layout. The
    finished figure must be visibly the same composition as the sketch.

If your output bears no spatial resemblance to the reference sketch,
you've failed the task. Refine the sketch — don't replace it. Just
give me the polished figure.

Try this prompt now

Open it inside the generator with the prompt pre-filled.

Try this prompt

Related prompts