Sketch图生图academic

GeoBench Overview: Verified Geometry Reasoning Tasks

Figure 1: Overview of GeoBench : (1) Generation of formally verified geometry problems with images, problems and reasoning graphs via TrustGeoGen ( trustgeogen2025 ) , followed by (2) systematic construction of hierarchical evaluation tasks through four reasoning capability levels.

输入图
生成结果

论文上下文

Paper title: GeoBench: Rethinking Multimodal Geometric Problem-Solving via Hierarchical Evaluation Abstract: Geometric problem solving constitutes a critical branch of mathematical reasoning, requiring precise analysis of shapes and spatial relationships. Current evaluations of geometric reasoning in vision-language models (VLMs) face limitations, including the risk of test data contamination from textbook-based benchmarks, overemphasis on final answers over reasoning processes, and insufficient diagnostic granularity. To address these issues, we present GeoBench, a hierarchical benchmark featuring four reasoning levels in geometric problem-solving: Visual Perception, Goal-Oriented Planning, Rigorous Theorem Application, and Self-Reflective Backtracking. Through six formally verified tasks generated via TrustGeoGen, we systematically assess capabilities ranging from attribute extraction to logical error correction. Experiments reveal that while reasoning models like OpenAI-o3 outperform general MLLMs, performance declines significantly with increasing task complexity. Key findings demonstrate that sub-goal decomposition and irrelevant premise filtering critically influence final problem-solving accuracy, whereas Chain-of-Thought prompting unexpectedly degrades performance in some tasks. These findings establish GeoBench as a comprehensive benchmark while offering actionable guidelines for developing geometric problem-solving systems. Passages referencing this figure: Figure 1: Overview of GeoBench : (1) Generation of formally verified geometry problems with images, problems and reasoning graphs via TrustGeoGen ( trustgeogen2025 ) , followed by (2) systematic construction of hierarchical evaluation tasks through four reasoning capability levels. As illustrated in Fig. 1 , the correct path 𝒫 \mathcal{P} (the goal-oriented reasoning path marked in Fig.

完整 Prompt

A reference image is attached above. It is my rough sketch of what I
want my final figure to look like — sometimes hand-drawn, sometimes
an AI quick-draft. The quality is rough; details may be wrong; some
elements may be missing — but it shows the STRUCTURE / SPATIAL LAYOUT
I'm going for.

I've also shared the paper title + abstract + method section + figure
caption + paragraphs that reference this figure.

TASK: Refine my rough sketch into a polished publication-quality figure.

  - Preserve the SPATIAL STRUCTURE of the sketch: where the boxes are,
    how they connect, the overall reading order, the rough proportions.
  - You may correct details: better text labels (use the paper context
    to get the right component names), cleaner shapes, real icons
    instead of stick-figure placeholders.
  - Do NOT regenerate from scratch with a different layout. The
    finished figure must be visibly the same composition as the sketch.

If your output bears no spatial resemblance to the reference sketch,
you've failed the task. Refine the sketch — don't replace it. Just
give me the polished figure.

立即试用此 Prompt

在生成器中自动预填此 prompt。

试用此 Prompt

相关 Prompt