Sketch图生图academic

Categorization of Object Tracking Methods

Figure 1: The Categorization of Tracking Methods.

输入图
生成结果

论文上下文

Paper title: Exploring Category-level Articulated Object Pose Tracking on SE(3) Manifolds Abstract: Articulated objects are prevalent in daily life and robotic manipulation tasks. However, compared to rigid objects, pose tracking for articulated objects remains an underexplored problem due to their inherent kinematic constraints. To address these challenges, this work proposes a novel point-pair-based pose tracking framework, termed \textbf{PPF-Tracker}. The proposed framework first performs quasi-canonicalization of point clouds in the SE(3) Lie group space, and then models articulated objects using Point Pair Features (PPF) to predict pose voting parameters by leveraging the invariance properties of SE(3). Finally, semantic information of joint axes is incorporated to impose unified kinematic constraints across all parts of the articulated object. PPF-Tracker is systematically evaluated on both synthetic datasets and real-world scenarios, demonstrating strong generalization across diverse and challenging environments. Experimental results highlight the effectiveness and robustness of PPF-Tracker in multi-frame pose tracking of articulated objects. We believe this work can foster advances in robotics, embodied intelligence, and augmented reality. Codes are available at https://github.com/mengxh20/PPFTracker. Passages referencing this figure: Figure 1: The Categorization of Tracking Methods. Traditional approaches often depend on dense predictions or frame-by-frame pose updates (Fig. 1 (a,b)) ( you2020multi ; wang20123 ) , which are computationally costly and unsuitable for real-time point cloud streams. To address the second challenge, we incorporate temporal priors from adjacent frames to guide pose prediction (Fig. 1 (c)).

完整 Prompt

A reference image is attached above. It is my rough sketch of what I
want my final figure to look like — sometimes hand-drawn, sometimes
an AI quick-draft. The quality is rough; details may be wrong; some
elements may be missing — but it shows the STRUCTURE / SPATIAL LAYOUT
I'm going for.

I've also shared the paper title + abstract + method section + figure
caption + paragraphs that reference this figure.

TASK: Refine my rough sketch into a polished publication-quality figure.

  - Preserve the SPATIAL STRUCTURE of the sketch: where the boxes are,
    how they connect, the overall reading order, the rough proportions.
  - You may correct details: better text labels (use the paper context
    to get the right component names), cleaner shapes, real icons
    instead of stick-figure placeholders.
  - Do NOT regenerate from scratch with a different layout. The
    finished figure must be visibly the same composition as the sketch.

If your output bears no spatial resemblance to the reference sketch,
you've failed the task. Refine the sketch — don't replace it. Just
give me the polished figure.

立即试用此 Prompt

在生成器中自动预填此 prompt。

试用此 Prompt

相关 Prompt