Text to Figure텍스트 → 이미지academic

CLARITY Framework Overview with Rule and LLM Components

Figure 1: Overview of the CLARITY framework . The symbols and denote rule-based and LLM-based components, respectively.

논문 컨텍스트

Paper title: CLARITY: A Framework and Benchmark for Conversational Language Ambiguity and Unanswerability in Interactive NL2SQL Systems Abstract: NL2SQL systems deployed in industry settings often encounter ambiguous or unanswerable queries, particularly in interactive scenarios with incomplete user clarification. Existing benchmarks typically assume a single source of ambiguity and rely on user interaction for resolution, overlooking realistic failure modes. We introduce Clarity, a framework for automatically generating an NL2SQL benchmark with multi-faceted ambiguities and diverse user behaviors across both single- and multi-turn settings. Using a constraint-driven pipeline, Clarity transforms executable SQL into ambiguous queries, augmented with grounded conversational continuations and schema-level metadata. Empirical evaluation on Spider and BIRD shows that leading NL2SQL systems, including those based on strong LLMs, suffer significant performance degradation under multi-faceted ambiguity. While these systems often detect ambiguity, they struggle to accurately localize and resolve the underlying schema-level sources. Our results highlight the need for more robust ambiguity detection and resolution in industry-grade NL2SQL systems. Passages referencing this figure: not assess whether systems correctly localize the schema elements responsible for uncertainty. Consequently, high ambiguity-detection accuracy may mask failures in schema-level identification and resolution. We argue that fine-grained, schema-grounded evaluation enables more diagnostic assessment of NL2SQL robustness, particularly under multi-faceted ambiguity and realistic interaction settings. Figure 1: Overview of the CLARITY framework . The symbols and denote rule-based and LLM-based components, respectively. Schema Entity Use Case AMBROSIA AmbiQT NoisySP SQUAB PRACTIQ MMSQL BIRD-INTERACT CLARITY (OURS) Type of Data - Single turn Single turn Single turn Single turn Multi turn Multi turn Multi turn Single and multi turn Column Unifacet Amb ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ Unifacet Unans ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓

프롬프트 본문

Above I've shared:
(1) the paper title + abstract + method section,
(2) the figure caption I want.

TASK: Render the main figure for this academic paper. Style requirements:

  - This is an ACADEMIC PAPER FIGURE (not a poster, not an infographic).
  - Clean black-on-white background; minimal decoration.
  - Components, arrows, and labels rendered crisply; small dense text OK.
  - Single-figure layout — no banner header, no "title" inside the image.
  - Match the level of detail of a top-tier conference paper figure
    (NeurIPS / ICLR / CVPR style).

Render the figure described in the caption. Just give me the final image.

지금 이 프롬프트 시도하기

생성기에 자동으로 채워진 상태로 열립니다.

이 프롬프트 시도

관련 프롬프트